Back to Legislative Guidelines
Legislative Guidelines

The Makuleke Community Land Claims

During the apartheid years, several communities, including the Makuleke community, were forcibly removed from their land in order for it to be assimilated into the Greater Kruger National Park.

The process to approval for extending a Sectional Title Unit

In 1995, under the Restitution of Land Rights Act, the Makuleke community demanded their rights to what was known as the Pafuri area. The issue was a complex one, with consideration having to be given to whether the alternative land the community had been given was adequate compensation for the land lost. There was also the question of the biodiversity value of the area.  

After intensive negotiations, a settlement was reached – one that has been described as a world class agreement and a breakthrough for conservation in South Africa – in which:

  • The land known as the Pafuri area has been returned to the Makuleke community.
  • No mining, farming or permanent residence may take place in the future without the permission of SANParks. 
  • Should the land ever be put up for sale, SANParks will have a right of first refusal.
  • A contractual park has been established for a period of 50 years which can be reviewed after 25 years.  
  • SANParks is responsible for the day-to-day conservation activities while the community is responsible for all tourism activities which are being managed by the JMB (Joint Management Board).  
  • The area is known as the Makuleke region within the larger Kruger National Park. Some 5 000 hectares outside of the Kruger National Park, which have not previously been included in the park, will be returned to the community and incorporated into the park. 

There are currently a number of other land claims against the Kruger National Park.

Note: The Greater Kruger Park refers to the combined conservation area of the Kruger National Park managed by SANParks and the adjacent privately owned game reserves – some of these share unfenced boundaries with the Kruger National Park to allow for the free movement of wildlife between them. The Kruger National Park also forms part of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park Initiative and shares an unfenced boundary with the Limpopo National Park in Mozambique.

Want more Snymans articles? Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.

Recommended for you

The difference between movable and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

The AARTO Act: constitutional or unconstitutional?[post_view before=""]

The constitutional validity of the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences (AARTO) Act and the Administrative Adjudication of Traffic Offences Amendment (AARTO Amendment) Act was recently challenged in the matter between the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) v The Minister of Transport and others.

Read More
My name has changed - what happens to my property’s title deed?
Legislative Guidelines

Universal Partnerships: what is required?[post_view before=""]

There is currently no statute in South Africa that regulates the relationships between cohabitees if they are not formally married.

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

CSOS and the courts: where do I take my dispute?[post_view before=""]

Here’s a look at a recent case which dealt with a dispute between the body corporate and residents in a sectional title scheme.

Read More
Your Trusted Partner in Residential and Commercial Property Transfers
Legislative Guidelines

The deal collapsed – is the attorney to blame?[post_view before=""]

The case of Nienaber N.O. and van den Berg (the plaintiffs) versus Nelson and Kitching Attorneys (the defendants) highlights the criteria of the duty of care a conveyancer should be aware of when providing services to clients. In this case, the plaintiffs instituted action alleging that the defendants owed them a duty of care as conveyancers and acted negligently and in breach of such duty. Let’s take a closer look.

Read More
Property Blog Articles | Advice | Contractual Matters | Market News
Legislative Guidelines

Court ruling: Sale of immovable property – Alienation of Land Act[post_view before=""]

In the recent case of Potgieter v Village and others, held at the High Court of South Africa, Northern Cape Division, Kimberly, the applicant applied for an urgent interdict to restrain the first and second respondents from passing transfer of a specific property. The application for the interdict was pending action by the applicant to claim transfer of the property. In this case, both parties to the contract were represented by their attorneys.

Read More

Need more Snymans content?

Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Legislative Guidelines

The Makuleke Community Land Claims

During the apartheid years, several communities, including the Makuleke community, were forcibly removed from their land in order for it to be assimilated into the Greater Kruger National Park.

The process to approval for extending a Sectional Title Unit

In 1995, under the Restitution of Land Rights Act, the Makuleke community demanded their rights to what was known as the Pafuri area. The issue was a complex one, with consideration having to be given to whether the alternative land the community had been given was adequate compensation for the land lost. There was also the question of the biodiversity value of the area.  

After intensive negotiations, a settlement was reached – one that has been described as a world class agreement and a breakthrough for conservation in South Africa – in which:

  • The land known as the Pafuri area has been returned to the Makuleke community.
  • No mining, farming or permanent residence may take place in the future without the permission of SANParks. 
  • Should the land ever be put up for sale, SANParks will have a right of first refusal.
  • A contractual park has been established for a period of 50 years which can be reviewed after 25 years.  
  • SANParks is responsible for the day-to-day conservation activities while the community is responsible for all tourism activities which are being managed by the JMB (Joint Management Board).  
  • The area is known as the Makuleke region within the larger Kruger National Park. Some 5 000 hectares outside of the Kruger National Park, which have not previously been included in the park, will be returned to the community and incorporated into the park. 

There are currently a number of other land claims against the Kruger National Park.

Note: The Greater Kruger Park refers to the combined conservation area of the Kruger National Park managed by SANParks and the adjacent privately owned game reserves – some of these share unfenced boundaries with the Kruger National Park to allow for the free movement of wildlife between them. The Kruger National Park also forms part of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park Initiative and shares an unfenced boundary with the Limpopo National Park in Mozambique.

Want more Snymans articles? Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.