Back to Sectional Title Governance
Sectional Title Governance

The Body Corporate and the Community Scheme Ombud Service

It is commonly accepted that the trustees appointed in a sectional title scheme have a fiduciary duty to manage the scheme in good faith and with its best interest in mind.  This is supported by the fact that all owners in a sectional title scheme have similar obligations toward other residents in the scheme and the common property. This is also underpinned by the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act 8 of 2011.

The process to approval for extending a Sectional Title Unit

In the matter of The Body Corporate of The Sorronto Sectional Title Scheme v Koordom and others, attempts were made to access the unit of the respondents to conduct a leak detection test as damp marks appeared on an adjacent unit. 

Access was allowed and a leak detection test was attended to, however the problem persisted. Further efforts were undertaken to resolve the damp issue. A second request was made to the respondents for access to the unit to attend to a second leak detection test, but this request was denied. This formed the basis of their application to the Western Cape High Court Division.

Evidently the respondents had a change of mind and accepted the fact that the applicant is allowed reasonable access to their unit to assist in properly managing the common property of the Sectional Title Scheme.

As the respondent had permitted access to the unit, there was no longer any cause for the court to decide upon and the only matter left was the order pertaining to costs.  Although the High Court cannot refuse to hear a matter of this nature, the learned Judge commented on the fact that neither of the parties had considered approaching the Community Scheme Ombud Service (CSOS) for relief.

One of the key points for the establishment of the Ombud is to provide a dispute resolution mechanism to community schemes in a cheaper and more informal way.  Regarding disputes, the Community Scheme Ombud Service Act states in Sec 38(1) that any person, including juristic entities, may make an application if the person is a party to or affected by a dispute.

It can be noted that if a specific dispute is within the ambit of the CSOS Act, the Ombud should be approached as a forum of first instance. The adjudication process established by the Act should then be followed, save for circumstances where another appropriate forum can be approached.  

The use of the Ombud should be encouraged as this can curb unnecessary litigation and legal costs pertaining to minor disputes. Legal practitioners must therefore take heed of the availability of the Ombud, more specifically towards matters that can be resolved through a more conciliatory approach.

Recommended for you

Your Trusted Partner in Residential and Commercial Property Transfers
Sectional Title Governance

Who moved my Deeds?[post_view before=""]

The e-DRSA will improve deed registration in South Africa by increasing efficiency and accuracy. However, involving key stakeholders, such as the Law Society of South Africa, South African Deeds Registries, and Department of Rural Development and Land Reform, is crucial. The cost and impact on the current paper-based system must also be considered.

Read More
The Electrical Compliance Certificate
Sectional Title Governance

Hear me roar: The use of generators in Sectional Title Schemes[post_view before=""]

There is no sound that pierces a fellow South Africans heart quite like the mighty roar of their neighbour’s generator in the early hours of the morning. While residents in Sectional Title Schemes dream of a day that they too can use a generator to mitigate the detrimental effects of loadshedding, they are awakened to a reality that does not allow for this.

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Sectional Title Governance

The Distinction Between Movable and Immovable Property[post_view before=""]

It is important to clearly distinguish between movable and immovable property when buying or selling a house. Movable property consists mainly of the owners’ personal belongings that can be moved freely and are not affixed to the property itself.

Read More
My name has changed - what happens to my property’s title deed?
Sectional Title Governance

What it means to be a trustee[post_view before=""]

The creation of a family trust has always been a popular way to manage and safeguard assets. It provides for continuity when it involves, for instance, the preservation of immoveable property for family generations. 

Read More
Your Trusted Partner in Residential and Commercial Property Transfers
Sectional Title Governance

The Family Home – A customary law concept gets acknowledgement from the CC[post_view before=""]

This is an application that ended up in the Constitutional Court, by a partner (applicant) who lived with her late partner in, what was to them, their family home. Upon the death of her late partner, she (the applicant) was appointed the executrix of her deceased partner’s estate who died intestate. The applicant and deceased were not married but had lived together for years in the family home the applicant had inherited from her late grandfather as a “family home” intended to be for the benefit of the family.

Read More

Need more Snymans content?

Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Sectional Title Governance

The Body Corporate and the Community Scheme Ombud Service

It is commonly accepted that the trustees appointed in a sectional title scheme have a fiduciary duty to manage the scheme in good faith and with its best interest in mind.  This is supported by the fact that all owners in a sectional title scheme have similar obligations toward other residents in the scheme and the common property. This is also underpinned by the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act 8 of 2011.

The process to approval for extending a Sectional Title Unit

In the matter of The Body Corporate of The Sorronto Sectional Title Scheme v Koordom and others, attempts were made to access the unit of the respondents to conduct a leak detection test as damp marks appeared on an adjacent unit. 

Access was allowed and a leak detection test was attended to, however the problem persisted. Further efforts were undertaken to resolve the damp issue. A second request was made to the respondents for access to the unit to attend to a second leak detection test, but this request was denied. This formed the basis of their application to the Western Cape High Court Division.

Evidently the respondents had a change of mind and accepted the fact that the applicant is allowed reasonable access to their unit to assist in properly managing the common property of the Sectional Title Scheme.

As the respondent had permitted access to the unit, there was no longer any cause for the court to decide upon and the only matter left was the order pertaining to costs.  Although the High Court cannot refuse to hear a matter of this nature, the learned Judge commented on the fact that neither of the parties had considered approaching the Community Scheme Ombud Service (CSOS) for relief.

One of the key points for the establishment of the Ombud is to provide a dispute resolution mechanism to community schemes in a cheaper and more informal way.  Regarding disputes, the Community Scheme Ombud Service Act states in Sec 38(1) that any person, including juristic entities, may make an application if the person is a party to or affected by a dispute.

It can be noted that if a specific dispute is within the ambit of the CSOS Act, the Ombud should be approached as a forum of first instance. The adjudication process established by the Act should then be followed, save for circumstances where another appropriate forum can be approached.  

The use of the Ombud should be encouraged as this can curb unnecessary litigation and legal costs pertaining to minor disputes. Legal practitioners must therefore take heed of the availability of the Ombud, more specifically towards matters that can be resolved through a more conciliatory approach.