SPLUMA in Mpumalanga: the saga continues

In this article, we take a closer look at an ongoing matter relating to SPLUMA in Mpumalanga. SPLUMA stands for the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, and all municipalities in the province have issued by-laws relating to SPLUMA certificates and the transfer of property.

Buying Property On Auction | Property Blog Articles

SPLUMA by-laws found to be invalid

In 2021, the Mpumalanga High Court in Middelburg found the SPLUMA by-laws in the Middelburg, Emalahleni and Kinross Municipalities to be unconstitutional and in contradiction with Section 118 of the Municipal Systems Act (relating to Clearance Applications). 

 

The court delivered this finding on the basis that these by-laws constituted an arbitrary deprivation of property as envisaged in s 25(1) of the Constitution. It also held that the by-laws were unconstitutional and invalid because they were not authorised by s 156 read with Part B of Schedule 4 of the Constitution and conflicted with s 118 of the Municipal Systems Act. 

 

The suspension of the orders

When the Mpumalanga High Court gave its decision in 2021, it suspended the above orders of unconstitutionality for six months to give the respective municipalities time to bring their by-laws in line with national legislation. However, on 17 June 2022, the Supreme Court of Appeal not only upheld the High Court’s decision regarding the unconstitutionality of the by-laws, it also overturned the suspension, with the judge stating that they could “see no reason to keep the invalid by-laws in operation”.

 

Due to the initial suspension, the Middelburg and Emalahleni Municipalities had continued to implement the SPLUMA by-laws, which required that SPLUMA certificates be issued as a requirement for the transfer of property. However, once the order of the Supreme Court of Appeals was handed down, the Registrar of Deeds could no longer insist that these certificates be issued for transfer to take place.

 

The matter didn’t end here, however.

 

The saga continues

On 12 July 2022, the Registrar of Deeds in Mpumalanga issued a notice stating that the Emalahleni Municipality had approached the Constitutional Court on 8 July 2022 for leave to appeal the 2022 Supreme Court of Appeal judgement.  

 

Where does this leave things? For now, the original judgement and the order of the Supreme Court of Appeal are suspended. This means that SPLUMA certificates must once again be lodged with the Registrar of Deeds until the Constitutional Court has heard the appeal and handed down a decision.

 

Want more Snymans articles? Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.

Recommended for you

Minors and immovable property
Sectional Title Governance

The Distinction Between Movable and Immovable Property[post_view before=""]

It is important to clearly distinguish between movable and immovable property when buying or selling a house. Movable property consists mainly of the owners’ personal belongings that can be moved freely and are not affixed to the property itself.

Read More
My name has changed - what happens to my property’s title deed?
Sectional Title Governance

What it means to be a trustee[post_view before=""]

The creation of a family trust has always been a popular way to manage and safeguard assets. It provides for continuity when it involves, for instance, the preservation of immoveable property for family generations. 

Read More
Your Trusted Partner in Residential and Commercial Property Transfers
Sectional Title Governance

The Family Home – A customary law concept gets acknowledgement from the CC[post_view before=""]

This is an application that ended up in the Constitutional Court, by a partner (applicant) who lived with her late partner in, what was to them, their family home. Upon the death of her late partner, she (the applicant) was appointed the executrix of her deceased partner’s estate who died intestate. The applicant and deceased were not married but had lived together for years in the family home the applicant had inherited from her late grandfather as a “family home” intended to be for the benefit of the family.

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Sectional Title Governance

The Body Corporate and the Community Scheme Ombud Service[post_view before=""]

It is commonly accepted that the trustees appointed in a sectional title scheme have a fiduciary duty to manage the scheme in good faith and with its best interest in mind.  This is supported by the fact that all owners in a sectional title scheme have similar obligations toward other residents in the scheme and the common property. This is also underpinned by the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act 8 of 2011.

Read More
Property Blog Articles | Advice | Contractual Matters | Market News
Sectional Title Governance

ULTRA – The CC once again confirms the importance of women’s rights in Rahube v Rahube and Others [2018] ZACC 42[post_view before=""]

This case involves the apartheid era, where not only rights of black people were oppressed but also rights of women. In this case, an entire family lived together in a property – that is, the applicant, her grandmother, uncle, three brothers (including the first respondent) and two children.

Read More

Need more Snymans content?

Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

SPLUMA in Mpumalanga: the saga continues

In this article, we take a closer look at an ongoing matter relating to SPLUMA in Mpumalanga. SPLUMA stands for the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, and all municipalities in the province have issued by-laws relating to SPLUMA certificates and the transfer of property.

Buying Property On Auction | Property Blog Articles

SPLUMA by-laws found to be invalid

In 2021, the Mpumalanga High Court in Middelburg found the SPLUMA by-laws in the Middelburg, Emalahleni and Kinross Municipalities to be unconstitutional and in contradiction with Section 118 of the Municipal Systems Act (relating to Clearance Applications). 

 

The court delivered this finding on the basis that these by-laws constituted an arbitrary deprivation of property as envisaged in s 25(1) of the Constitution. It also held that the by-laws were unconstitutional and invalid because they were not authorised by s 156 read with Part B of Schedule 4 of the Constitution and conflicted with s 118 of the Municipal Systems Act. 

 

The suspension of the orders

When the Mpumalanga High Court gave its decision in 2021, it suspended the above orders of unconstitutionality for six months to give the respective municipalities time to bring their by-laws in line with national legislation. However, on 17 June 2022, the Supreme Court of Appeal not only upheld the High Court’s decision regarding the unconstitutionality of the by-laws, it also overturned the suspension, with the judge stating that they could “see no reason to keep the invalid by-laws in operation”.

 

Due to the initial suspension, the Middelburg and Emalahleni Municipalities had continued to implement the SPLUMA by-laws, which required that SPLUMA certificates be issued as a requirement for the transfer of property. However, once the order of the Supreme Court of Appeals was handed down, the Registrar of Deeds could no longer insist that these certificates be issued for transfer to take place.

 

The matter didn’t end here, however.

 

The saga continues

On 12 July 2022, the Registrar of Deeds in Mpumalanga issued a notice stating that the Emalahleni Municipality had approached the Constitutional Court on 8 July 2022 for leave to appeal the 2022 Supreme Court of Appeal judgement.  

 

Where does this leave things? For now, the original judgement and the order of the Supreme Court of Appeal are suspended. This means that SPLUMA certificates must once again be lodged with the Registrar of Deeds until the Constitutional Court has heard the appeal and handed down a decision.

 

Want more Snymans articles? Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.