Don’t Land Up In Hot Water

The potential impact of unapproved building plans when it comes time to sell.

The ins and outs of subject to bond approval clauses

The National Building Regulations and Buildings Standards Act, 103 of 1977, dictates that no building may be erected without the necessary plans being submitted to and approved by the local authority.

While conforming to these regulations may seem complicated and unnecessary at first, it is important to note that their implementation is intended to ensure the enjoyment by all owners of the land which belongs to them, without it disrupting others.

The consequences for owners who alter or extend their property without the necessary approval can be quite severe. While there is the possibility of applying for approval retrospectively, should this be denied, the local authority is within their rights to order the building, or part thereof, to be demolished. Of course, this can be incredibly unpleasant, not to mention, costly for the owner.

It is, however, possible to remedy the situation through applying and obtaining the necessary council approval even once the construction has been completed. This will involve drawing up the building plans which will require the expertise of a qualified architect or draughtsman. These plans will then be submitted to council for approval. When it comes to a property transfer, unapproved building alterations can pose a significant problem for the seller.

Selling a property with unauthorized alterations may be seen as a misrepresentation. If these alterations are not disclosed, it can result in the seller being liable for claims. To prevent this the Estate Agent should address these alterations prior to the buyer signing the offer to purchase.

As previously mentioned, it is possible to apply for approval to the local authority, which would include the drawing up of plans to be submitted for consideration. The approval of these plans can also be included in the offer to purchase as a suspensive condition to protect a buyer. This means that should the requisite approval not be obtained, the offer to purchase will not constitute a valid contract of sale and the buyer will not be bound by the terms of the sale. He or she will then be free to make an offer and to purchase another property.

Of course, this retrospective application should not be considered the first option as it can delay property sales and can result in unnecessary costs. Plus, there is no guarantee that the plans will be accepted. Instead, it is recommended to have the necessary plans drawn up and the requisite approval received before moving ahead with any construction or alteration to a property.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal advice, information and news about property.

Recommended for you

My name has changed - what happens to my property’s title deed?
Legislative Guidelines

The concept of control in the juristic world[post_view before=""]

Disputes or issues around decision making in a company very often involve the question of control – and it’s likely that the decision maker is the one who controls the company.

Read More
Property Blog Articles | Advice | Contractual Matters | Market News
Legislative Guidelines

The importance of a signed OTP[post_view before=""]

The Alienation of Land Act (ALA) clearly states that the validity of an Offer to Purchase (OTP) depends on the contract for the sale of immovable property being in writing and signed by the concerned parties or their authorised representatives acting on their written instruction. And the importance of signatures on an agreement of sale has once again been highlighted by a recent decision handed down by the Gauteng Local Division of the High Court in Johannesburg.

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

Court ruling: What if Occupation is Granted in an Agreement of Sale and the Seller Enters into a Second Agreement?[post_view before=""]

In the matter of Fulsome Properties (Pty) Ltd v Selepe and Others held recently at the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria, Fulsome Properties (Pty) Ltd (the applicant) requested an urgent interdict to restrain the first and second respondents (Fiona Gontse Selepe and Lentse Investments) from communicating and interfering in any manner whatsoever with the applicant’s tenant(s) residing at the property in question.

Read More
Property Blog Articles | Advice | Contractual Matters | Market News
Legislative Guidelines

Court ruling: The Subdivision of Agricultural Land[post_view before=""]

In a recent decision of the Appellate Division in Bloemfontein, in the matter of Maxrae Estates (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and Another (407/2020) [2021] ZASCA 73 (9 June 2021), the court made it clear that the executive must apply its mind prior to making decisions or exercising its legislative discretion.

Read More
Property Blog Articles | Advice | Contractual Matters | Market News
Legislative Guidelines

SPLUMA certificates required for property transfers in Mpumalanga[post_view before=""]

SPLUMA stands for the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, and SPLUMA certificates are governed by the act together with the by-laws of each local municipality.

Read More

Need more Snymans content?

Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Don’t Land Up In Hot Water

The potential impact of unapproved building plans when it comes time to sell.

The ins and outs of subject to bond approval clauses

The National Building Regulations and Buildings Standards Act, 103 of 1977, dictates that no building may be erected without the necessary plans being submitted to and approved by the local authority.

While conforming to these regulations may seem complicated and unnecessary at first, it is important to note that their implementation is intended to ensure the enjoyment by all owners of the land which belongs to them, without it disrupting others.

The consequences for owners who alter or extend their property without the necessary approval can be quite severe. While there is the possibility of applying for approval retrospectively, should this be denied, the local authority is within their rights to order the building, or part thereof, to be demolished. Of course, this can be incredibly unpleasant, not to mention, costly for the owner.

It is, however, possible to remedy the situation through applying and obtaining the necessary council approval even once the construction has been completed. This will involve drawing up the building plans which will require the expertise of a qualified architect or draughtsman. These plans will then be submitted to council for approval. When it comes to a property transfer, unapproved building alterations can pose a significant problem for the seller.

Selling a property with unauthorized alterations may be seen as a misrepresentation. If these alterations are not disclosed, it can result in the seller being liable for claims. To prevent this the Estate Agent should address these alterations prior to the buyer signing the offer to purchase.

As previously mentioned, it is possible to apply for approval to the local authority, which would include the drawing up of plans to be submitted for consideration. The approval of these plans can also be included in the offer to purchase as a suspensive condition to protect a buyer. This means that should the requisite approval not be obtained, the offer to purchase will not constitute a valid contract of sale and the buyer will not be bound by the terms of the sale. He or she will then be free to make an offer and to purchase another property.

Of course, this retrospective application should not be considered the first option as it can delay property sales and can result in unnecessary costs. Plus, there is no guarantee that the plans will be accepted. Instead, it is recommended to have the necessary plans drawn up and the requisite approval received before moving ahead with any construction or alteration to a property.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal advice, information and news about property.