Destruction of a sectional title scheme: precautionary steps to take

There are several reasons why a landowner or developer may decide to build a new development in the place of an existing sectional title scheme. For example, the existing scheme may be dated and no longer suited to the area. Or the demand for residential units may be very high but the old development is undesirable.

The ins and outs of subject to bond approval clauses

Regardless of the reason, when the decision is taken, the existing sectional title scheme must be ‘destroyed’ as per the requirements of the Sectional Titles Act 95 of 1986 (STA) and the Sectional Title Schemes Management Act 8 of 2011 (STSMA).  

Section 17 of the STSMA requires that a unanimous resolution be passed by a meeting of trustees and owners. The resolution must record the following: 

  1. It was unanimously resolved that in terms of Section 49 of the Sectional Titles Act of 1986 that the building or buildings in the scheme are deemed to be destroyed.
  2. The owners present do hereby unanimously resolve not to rebuild the building or buildings. 
  3. The land shall revert to the land register.
  4. That following the deemed destruction the owners shall cease to be separate owners of sections but shall, subject to the provisions of Section 17(2) of the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act 8 of 2011, remain co-owners of the land in undivided shares proportionate to the quotas of the respective sections previously owned by them.

This resolution makes it clear that the land in question will revert to the conventional land register – i.e. it is no longer sectional title property – and that all owners shall remain co-owners in undivided shares. Once this resolution has been passed, the relevant deeds registry must be notified of the destruction of this scheme. 

The notification should take the following form: 

TO THE REGISTRAR OF DEEDS

NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 17(9) OF THE SECTIONAL TITLES SCHEMES MANAGEMENT ACT, ACT 8 OF 2011

We, JACK AND JILL DANIELS,

In our capacity as Trustees of the Body Corporate of the schemes known as

THE HILL CLIMB COTTAGES

Hereby give notice in terms of Section 17(9) of the Sectional Title Schemes Management Act, No. 8 of 2011 that the buildings are deemed to be destroyed on account of the unanimous resolution dated 1 May 2021 and that the owners have by unanimous resolution resolved not to rebuild the building or buildings.

The following documents must be attached to the notice: 

  • A certified copy of the unanimous resolution of the owners that the buildings are deemed to be destroyed, together with the written consent of the holders of registered sectional mortgage bonds.
  • A certified copy of the unanimous resolution of the owners not to rebuild.

It is important to note that any bondholders (bank) must also provide their consent for the destruction of the scheme. 

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.

Recommended for you

The difference between movable and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

The AARTO Act: constitutional or unconstitutional?[post_view before=""]

The constitutional validity of the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences (AARTO) Act and the Administrative Adjudication of Traffic Offences Amendment (AARTO Amendment) Act was recently challenged in the matter between the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) v The Minister of Transport and others.

Read More
My name has changed - what happens to my property’s title deed?
Legislative Guidelines

Universal Partnerships: what is required?[post_view before=""]

There is currently no statute in South Africa that regulates the relationships between cohabitees if they are not formally married.

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

CSOS and the courts: where do I take my dispute?[post_view before=""]

Here’s a look at a recent case which dealt with a dispute between the body corporate and residents in a sectional title scheme.

Read More
Your Trusted Partner in Residential and Commercial Property Transfers
Legislative Guidelines

The deal collapsed – is the attorney to blame?[post_view before=""]

The case of Nienaber N.O. and van den Berg (the plaintiffs) versus Nelson and Kitching Attorneys (the defendants) highlights the criteria of the duty of care a conveyancer should be aware of when providing services to clients. In this case, the plaintiffs instituted action alleging that the defendants owed them a duty of care as conveyancers and acted negligently and in breach of such duty. Let’s take a closer look.

Read More
Property Blog Articles | Advice | Contractual Matters | Market News
Legislative Guidelines

Court ruling: Sale of immovable property – Alienation of Land Act[post_view before=""]

In the recent case of Potgieter v Village and others, held at the High Court of South Africa, Northern Cape Division, Kimberly, the applicant applied for an urgent interdict to restrain the first and second respondents from passing transfer of a specific property. The application for the interdict was pending action by the applicant to claim transfer of the property. In this case, both parties to the contract were represented by their attorneys.

Read More

Need more Snymans content?

Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Destruction of a sectional title scheme: precautionary steps to take

There are several reasons why a landowner or developer may decide to build a new development in the place of an existing sectional title scheme. For example, the existing scheme may be dated and no longer suited to the area. Or the demand for residential units may be very high but the old development is undesirable.

The ins and outs of subject to bond approval clauses

Regardless of the reason, when the decision is taken, the existing sectional title scheme must be ‘destroyed’ as per the requirements of the Sectional Titles Act 95 of 1986 (STA) and the Sectional Title Schemes Management Act 8 of 2011 (STSMA).  

Section 17 of the STSMA requires that a unanimous resolution be passed by a meeting of trustees and owners. The resolution must record the following: 

  1. It was unanimously resolved that in terms of Section 49 of the Sectional Titles Act of 1986 that the building or buildings in the scheme are deemed to be destroyed.
  2. The owners present do hereby unanimously resolve not to rebuild the building or buildings. 
  3. The land shall revert to the land register.
  4. That following the deemed destruction the owners shall cease to be separate owners of sections but shall, subject to the provisions of Section 17(2) of the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act 8 of 2011, remain co-owners of the land in undivided shares proportionate to the quotas of the respective sections previously owned by them.

This resolution makes it clear that the land in question will revert to the conventional land register – i.e. it is no longer sectional title property – and that all owners shall remain co-owners in undivided shares. Once this resolution has been passed, the relevant deeds registry must be notified of the destruction of this scheme. 

The notification should take the following form: 

TO THE REGISTRAR OF DEEDS

NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 17(9) OF THE SECTIONAL TITLES SCHEMES MANAGEMENT ACT, ACT 8 OF 2011

We, JACK AND JILL DANIELS,

In our capacity as Trustees of the Body Corporate of the schemes known as

THE HILL CLIMB COTTAGES

Hereby give notice in terms of Section 17(9) of the Sectional Title Schemes Management Act, No. 8 of 2011 that the buildings are deemed to be destroyed on account of the unanimous resolution dated 1 May 2021 and that the owners have by unanimous resolution resolved not to rebuild the building or buildings.

The following documents must be attached to the notice: 

  • A certified copy of the unanimous resolution of the owners that the buildings are deemed to be destroyed, together with the written consent of the holders of registered sectional mortgage bonds.
  • A certified copy of the unanimous resolution of the owners not to rebuild.

It is important to note that any bondholders (bank) must also provide their consent for the destruction of the scheme. 

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.