Court ruling: Sale of immovable property – Alienation of Land Act

In the recent case of Potgieter v Village and others, held at the High Court of South Africa, Northern Cape Division, Kimberly, the applicant applied for an urgent interdict to restrain the first and second respondents from passing transfer of a specific property. The application for the interdict was pending action by the applicant to claim transfer of the property. In this case, both parties to the contract were represented by their attorneys.

Divorce Guidelines In & Out of Community of Property

The Alienation of Land Act (Act 68 of 1981) sets out the statutory requirements that are required when dealing with the sale of immovable property.

Section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act reads as follows: “No alienation of land after the commencement of this section shall, subject to the provisions of section 28, be of any force or effect unless it is contained in a deed of alienation signed by the parties thereto or by their agents acting on their written authority.”

The court’s decision

The court found that in order to comply with the statutory requirements stipulated in section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act, the attorneys (representatives) of both the seller and purchasers would have had to have written authority to bind them (their respective principals) to a valid agreement to sell land. In the lack of such written authority, there is no basis to hold that a valid and binding sale, in respect of the relevant immovable property, has been established.  

It is therefore fundamental to comply with the provisions of section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act when entering into an agreement of sale and to ensure that the required written authority is given to a representative should he or she enter into the agreement on behalf of one of the parties.

Want more Snymans articles? Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.

Recommended for you

Transfer and Bond Calculators
Legislative Guidelines

The Financial Intelligence Centre Act of 2001 and Cash Threshold Reporting[post_view before=""]

When does the reporting obligation arise for an accountable or reporting institution?

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

The advantages of a life right[post_view before=""]

The Housing Development Schemes for Retired Persons Act 65 of 1988 introduced life rights as a formal form of ownership for retired people in South Africa. This legislation was implemented not only in response to the growth in the retirement village sector but also to provide legal protection to the elderly.

Read More
My name has changed - what happens to my property’s title deed?
Legislative Guidelines

Muslim marriages: A welcome Constitutional Court decision[post_view before=""]

In a long-awaited and groundbreaking decision in the area of family law, the Constitutional Court of South Africa (CC) confirmed the order of constitutional invalidity of the below mentioned Acts, granted by the Supreme Court of Appeal. This decision was confirmed on 28 June 2022.

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

Selling a property without approved building plans[post_view before=""]

It’s often the case that a seller would like to sell – and a purchaser would like to buy – a property without approved building plans or an occupation certificate. But what does the law say?  In terms of the…

Read More
My name has changed - what happens to my property’s title deed?
Legislative Guidelines

The Divorce Act and marriage out of community of property without accrual[post_view before=""]

In this article, we explore the issue of the constitutional validity of section 7(3)(1) of the Divorce Act in respect of marriages entered into after 1 November 1984 and excluding the accrual system.

Read More

Need more Snymans content?

Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Court ruling: Sale of immovable property – Alienation of Land Act

In the recent case of Potgieter v Village and others, held at the High Court of South Africa, Northern Cape Division, Kimberly, the applicant applied for an urgent interdict to restrain the first and second respondents from passing transfer of a specific property. The application for the interdict was pending action by the applicant to claim transfer of the property. In this case, both parties to the contract were represented by their attorneys.

Divorce Guidelines In & Out of Community of Property

The Alienation of Land Act (Act 68 of 1981) sets out the statutory requirements that are required when dealing with the sale of immovable property.

Section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act reads as follows: “No alienation of land after the commencement of this section shall, subject to the provisions of section 28, be of any force or effect unless it is contained in a deed of alienation signed by the parties thereto or by their agents acting on their written authority.”

The court’s decision

The court found that in order to comply with the statutory requirements stipulated in section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act, the attorneys (representatives) of both the seller and purchasers would have had to have written authority to bind them (their respective principals) to a valid agreement to sell land. In the lack of such written authority, there is no basis to hold that a valid and binding sale, in respect of the relevant immovable property, has been established.  

It is therefore fundamental to comply with the provisions of section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act when entering into an agreement of sale and to ensure that the required written authority is given to a representative should he or she enter into the agreement on behalf of one of the parties.

Want more Snymans articles? Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.