Court ruling: Sale of immovable property – Alienation of Land Act

In the recent case of Potgieter v Village and others, held at the High Court of South Africa, Northern Cape Division, Kimberly, the applicant applied for an urgent interdict to restrain the first and second respondents from passing transfer of a specific property. The application for the interdict was pending action by the applicant to claim transfer of the property. In this case, both parties to the contract were represented by their attorneys.

Divorce Guidelines In & Out of Community of Property

The Alienation of Land Act (Act 68 of 1981) sets out the statutory requirements that are required when dealing with the sale of immovable property.

Section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act reads as follows: “No alienation of land after the commencement of this section shall, subject to the provisions of section 28, be of any force or effect unless it is contained in a deed of alienation signed by the parties thereto or by their agents acting on their written authority.”

The court’s decision

The court found that in order to comply with the statutory requirements stipulated in section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act, the attorneys (representatives) of both the seller and purchasers would have had to have written authority to bind them (their respective principals) to a valid agreement to sell land. In the lack of such written authority, there is no basis to hold that a valid and binding sale, in respect of the relevant immovable property, has been established.  

It is therefore fundamental to comply with the provisions of section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act when entering into an agreement of sale and to ensure that the required written authority is given to a representative should he or she enter into the agreement on behalf of one of the parties.

Want more Snymans articles? Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.

Recommended for you

Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

Caveats and Endorsements Noted Against a Property[post_view before=""]

Conveyancers are keen investigators, they are specialists in their field as they exercise knowledge and skill in all of the transactions. Although every transaction might be different, the principles remain the same.

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

A Bird’s View on the Case of Werner and Werner V Paula Barnard N.O. And Others and the Battle of Vacant Possession[post_view before=""]

This article discusses the voetstoots clause. Be careful of what you litigate for and against whom, for you might not always get what you ask for. Do not act in the heat of the moment, without the proper consideration of all the facts. Do your homework and choose your attorneys carefully to apply their minds and the law. This case is a classic example of the consequences of the wrong legal advice and strategy.

Read More
Transfer and Bond Calculators
Legislative Guidelines

Is the Landlord’s Right to Rental Income Adequately Protected Under South African Law[post_view before=""]

Under South African Law, the rights of the landlord/lessor to receive rent from their tenants is adequately protected. If the landlord fulfils his duties according to the lease agreement, there is no reason why a tenant should not pay their rent.

Read More
Properties using borehole water must display a sign
Legislative Guidelines

Environmental Law: Water Rights & Water Pollution in South Africa[post_view before=""]

South Africa is a relatively water-scarce country. The regulation and implementation of water use is therefore very important.

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

Legal rights of homeowners during the repossession process[post_view before=""]

November 2021, January 2022, September 2022, and November 2022 were pivotal months for many homeowners in South Africa who were forced to revaluate their financial positions with the interest rate increases.

Read More

Need more Snymans content?

Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Court ruling: Sale of immovable property – Alienation of Land Act

In the recent case of Potgieter v Village and others, held at the High Court of South Africa, Northern Cape Division, Kimberly, the applicant applied for an urgent interdict to restrain the first and second respondents from passing transfer of a specific property. The application for the interdict was pending action by the applicant to claim transfer of the property. In this case, both parties to the contract were represented by their attorneys.

Divorce Guidelines In & Out of Community of Property

The Alienation of Land Act (Act 68 of 1981) sets out the statutory requirements that are required when dealing with the sale of immovable property.

Section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act reads as follows: “No alienation of land after the commencement of this section shall, subject to the provisions of section 28, be of any force or effect unless it is contained in a deed of alienation signed by the parties thereto or by their agents acting on their written authority.”

The court’s decision

The court found that in order to comply with the statutory requirements stipulated in section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act, the attorneys (representatives) of both the seller and purchasers would have had to have written authority to bind them (their respective principals) to a valid agreement to sell land. In the lack of such written authority, there is no basis to hold that a valid and binding sale, in respect of the relevant immovable property, has been established.  

It is therefore fundamental to comply with the provisions of section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act when entering into an agreement of sale and to ensure that the required written authority is given to a representative should he or she enter into the agreement on behalf of one of the parties.

Want more Snymans articles? Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.