Buying a property in the name of a company or trust – the pros and cons

There is much written about the sale and transfer of property by individuals in their personal capacity. But transactions involving the purchase by a legal entity such as a company, trust, or close corporation are dealt with slightly differently.

The ins and outs of subject to bond approval clauses

While most of the general steps involved in a property transfer remain unchanged, when a legal entity, such as a company or trust, purchases a property, the process differs slightly, particularly regarding the required documentation in order to complete the transfer.

The transfer process

Most significantly, in order for a legal entity to purchase a property, an individual or individuals must be empowered by all its members, directors or trustees, by way of resolution (written “decision”) to sign the offer to purchase on behalf of the company, trust or close corporation. This means that such an individual is given the necessary capacity to represent the legal entity in the transaction by way of resolution. The statutory documents of the legal entity will on its part provide authority for entering into a transaction of such nature.

When it comes to the signing of the transfer documentation, the authorised individual will again sign documents on behalf of the legal entity.

The documentation required is far more extensive when dealing with a property transfer where a legal entity, rather than an individual, is the buyer. These will include additional affidavits, resolutions and an auditor’s certificate confirming that all financials are in order.

The pros and cons of purchasing as an entity

There are a number of benefits that come with purchasing a property in the name of a legal entity rather than as an individual. For example, it provides protection against personal insolvency since a property that is in the name of a legal entity will not be affected or attached should the private individual, such as a trustee or director, become personally insolvent.

In addition, the tax implications can be advantageous. If the legal entity selling is a VAT vendor, transfer duty will not be applicable and VAT may be reclaimed in certain circumstances, and if both the seller and purchaser are registered for VAT, the transaction may be taxed at a zero rate in certain specific circumstances.

However, there are also potential negative impacts relating to tax when it comes to the later sale of the property. In particular, if the property is not a primary residence, the sale will be subject to Capital Gains Tax and the percentage charged is significantly higher than that for an individual. Secondary tax on companies STC and dividend tax may also apply in certain circumstances.

Reselling the property

Because the property is owned by a legal entity, the shareholders, members or trustees will have to act on its behalf in a proposed sale once a vote to proceed with such a sale has been held. A resolution will need to be passed, and an individual given power in order to sign the transfer documents as was done during the purchase process. If the property being sold is the only asset owned by company, there will be certain additional requirements to be met in terms of the Companies Act.

Each situation comes with its own nuances, and as such, working with experienced professionals will ensure that all relevant legislation is complied with and that the transfer process proceeds smoothly.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.

Recommended for you

The difference between movable and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

The AARTO Act: constitutional or unconstitutional?[post_view before=""]

The constitutional validity of the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences (AARTO) Act and the Administrative Adjudication of Traffic Offences Amendment (AARTO Amendment) Act was recently challenged in the matter between the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) v The Minister of Transport and others.

Read More
My name has changed - what happens to my property’s title deed?
Legislative Guidelines

Universal Partnerships: what is required?[post_view before=""]

There is currently no statute in South Africa that regulates the relationships between cohabitees if they are not formally married.

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

CSOS and the courts: where do I take my dispute?[post_view before=""]

Here’s a look at a recent case which dealt with a dispute between the body corporate and residents in a sectional title scheme.

Read More
Your Trusted Partner in Residential and Commercial Property Transfers
Legislative Guidelines

The deal collapsed – is the attorney to blame?[post_view before=""]

The case of Nienaber N.O. and van den Berg (the plaintiffs) versus Nelson and Kitching Attorneys (the defendants) highlights the criteria of the duty of care a conveyancer should be aware of when providing services to clients. In this case, the plaintiffs instituted action alleging that the defendants owed them a duty of care as conveyancers and acted negligently and in breach of such duty. Let’s take a closer look.

Read More
Property Blog Articles | Advice | Contractual Matters | Market News
Legislative Guidelines

Court ruling: Sale of immovable property – Alienation of Land Act[post_view before=""]

In the recent case of Potgieter v Village and others, held at the High Court of South Africa, Northern Cape Division, Kimberly, the applicant applied for an urgent interdict to restrain the first and second respondents from passing transfer of a specific property. The application for the interdict was pending action by the applicant to claim transfer of the property. In this case, both parties to the contract were represented by their attorneys.

Read More

Need more Snymans content?

Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Buying a property in the name of a company or trust – the pros and cons

There is much written about the sale and transfer of property by individuals in their personal capacity. But transactions involving the purchase by a legal entity such as a company, trust, or close corporation are dealt with slightly differently.

The ins and outs of subject to bond approval clauses

While most of the general steps involved in a property transfer remain unchanged, when a legal entity, such as a company or trust, purchases a property, the process differs slightly, particularly regarding the required documentation in order to complete the transfer.

The transfer process

Most significantly, in order for a legal entity to purchase a property, an individual or individuals must be empowered by all its members, directors or trustees, by way of resolution (written “decision”) to sign the offer to purchase on behalf of the company, trust or close corporation. This means that such an individual is given the necessary capacity to represent the legal entity in the transaction by way of resolution. The statutory documents of the legal entity will on its part provide authority for entering into a transaction of such nature.

When it comes to the signing of the transfer documentation, the authorised individual will again sign documents on behalf of the legal entity.

The documentation required is far more extensive when dealing with a property transfer where a legal entity, rather than an individual, is the buyer. These will include additional affidavits, resolutions and an auditor’s certificate confirming that all financials are in order.

The pros and cons of purchasing as an entity

There are a number of benefits that come with purchasing a property in the name of a legal entity rather than as an individual. For example, it provides protection against personal insolvency since a property that is in the name of a legal entity will not be affected or attached should the private individual, such as a trustee or director, become personally insolvent.

In addition, the tax implications can be advantageous. If the legal entity selling is a VAT vendor, transfer duty will not be applicable and VAT may be reclaimed in certain circumstances, and if both the seller and purchaser are registered for VAT, the transaction may be taxed at a zero rate in certain specific circumstances.

However, there are also potential negative impacts relating to tax when it comes to the later sale of the property. In particular, if the property is not a primary residence, the sale will be subject to Capital Gains Tax and the percentage charged is significantly higher than that for an individual. Secondary tax on companies STC and dividend tax may also apply in certain circumstances.

Reselling the property

Because the property is owned by a legal entity, the shareholders, members or trustees will have to act on its behalf in a proposed sale once a vote to proceed with such a sale has been held. A resolution will need to be passed, and an individual given power in order to sign the transfer documents as was done during the purchase process. If the property being sold is the only asset owned by company, there will be certain additional requirements to be met in terms of the Companies Act.

Each situation comes with its own nuances, and as such, working with experienced professionals will ensure that all relevant legislation is complied with and that the transfer process proceeds smoothly.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.