Buying a property in the name of a company or trust – the pros and cons

There is much written about the sale and transfer of property by individuals in their personal capacity. But transactions involving the purchase by a legal entity such as a company, trust, or close corporation are dealt with slightly differently.

The ins and outs of subject to bond approval clauses

While most of the general steps involved in a property transfer remain unchanged, when a legal entity, such as a company or trust, purchases a property, the process differs slightly, particularly regarding the required documentation in order to complete the transfer.

The transfer process

Most significantly, in order for a legal entity to purchase a property, an individual or individuals must be empowered by all its members, directors or trustees, by way of resolution (written “decision”) to sign the offer to purchase on behalf of the company, trust or close corporation. This means that such an individual is given the necessary capacity to represent the legal entity in the transaction by way of resolution. The statutory documents of the legal entity will on its part provide authority for entering into a transaction of such nature.

When it comes to the signing of the transfer documentation, the authorised individual will again sign documents on behalf of the legal entity.

The documentation required is far more extensive when dealing with a property transfer where a legal entity, rather than an individual, is the buyer. These will include additional affidavits, resolutions and an auditor’s certificate confirming that all financials are in order.

The pros and cons of purchasing as an entity

There are a number of benefits that come with purchasing a property in the name of a legal entity rather than as an individual. For example, it provides protection against personal insolvency since a property that is in the name of a legal entity will not be affected or attached should the private individual, such as a trustee or director, become personally insolvent.

In addition, the tax implications can be advantageous. If the legal entity selling is a VAT vendor, transfer duty will not be applicable and VAT may be reclaimed in certain circumstances, and if both the seller and purchaser are registered for VAT, the transaction may be taxed at a zero rate in certain specific circumstances.

However, there are also potential negative impacts relating to tax when it comes to the later sale of the property. In particular, if the property is not a primary residence, the sale will be subject to Capital Gains Tax and the percentage charged is significantly higher than that for an individual. Secondary tax on companies STC and dividend tax may also apply in certain circumstances.

Reselling the property

Because the property is owned by a legal entity, the shareholders, members or trustees will have to act on its behalf in a proposed sale once a vote to proceed with such a sale has been held. A resolution will need to be passed, and an individual given power in order to sign the transfer documents as was done during the purchase process. If the property being sold is the only asset owned by company, there will be certain additional requirements to be met in terms of the Companies Act.

Each situation comes with its own nuances, and as such, working with experienced professionals will ensure that all relevant legislation is complied with and that the transfer process proceeds smoothly.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.

Recommended for you

My name has changed - what happens to my property’s title deed?
Legislative Guidelines

The concept of control in the juristic world[post_view before=""]

Disputes or issues around decision making in a company very often involve the question of control – and it’s likely that the decision maker is the one who controls the company.

Read More
Property Blog Articles | Advice | Contractual Matters | Market News
Legislative Guidelines

The importance of a signed OTP[post_view before=""]

The Alienation of Land Act (ALA) clearly states that the validity of an Offer to Purchase (OTP) depends on the contract for the sale of immovable property being in writing and signed by the concerned parties or their authorised representatives acting on their written instruction. And the importance of signatures on an agreement of sale has once again been highlighted by a recent decision handed down by the Gauteng Local Division of the High Court in Johannesburg.

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

Court ruling: What if Occupation is Granted in an Agreement of Sale and the Seller Enters into a Second Agreement?[post_view before=""]

In the matter of Fulsome Properties (Pty) Ltd v Selepe and Others held recently at the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria, Fulsome Properties (Pty) Ltd (the applicant) requested an urgent interdict to restrain the first and second respondents (Fiona Gontse Selepe and Lentse Investments) from communicating and interfering in any manner whatsoever with the applicant’s tenant(s) residing at the property in question.

Read More
Property Blog Articles | Advice | Contractual Matters | Market News
Legislative Guidelines

Court ruling: The Subdivision of Agricultural Land[post_view before=""]

In a recent decision of the Appellate Division in Bloemfontein, in the matter of Maxrae Estates (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and Another (407/2020) [2021] ZASCA 73 (9 June 2021), the court made it clear that the executive must apply its mind prior to making decisions or exercising its legislative discretion.

Read More
Property Blog Articles | Advice | Contractual Matters | Market News
Legislative Guidelines

SPLUMA certificates required for property transfers in Mpumalanga[post_view before=""]

SPLUMA stands for the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, and SPLUMA certificates are governed by the act together with the by-laws of each local municipality.

Read More

Need more Snymans content?

Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Buying a property in the name of a company or trust – the pros and cons

There is much written about the sale and transfer of property by individuals in their personal capacity. But transactions involving the purchase by a legal entity such as a company, trust, or close corporation are dealt with slightly differently.

The ins and outs of subject to bond approval clauses

While most of the general steps involved in a property transfer remain unchanged, when a legal entity, such as a company or trust, purchases a property, the process differs slightly, particularly regarding the required documentation in order to complete the transfer.

The transfer process

Most significantly, in order for a legal entity to purchase a property, an individual or individuals must be empowered by all its members, directors or trustees, by way of resolution (written “decision”) to sign the offer to purchase on behalf of the company, trust or close corporation. This means that such an individual is given the necessary capacity to represent the legal entity in the transaction by way of resolution. The statutory documents of the legal entity will on its part provide authority for entering into a transaction of such nature.

When it comes to the signing of the transfer documentation, the authorised individual will again sign documents on behalf of the legal entity.

The documentation required is far more extensive when dealing with a property transfer where a legal entity, rather than an individual, is the buyer. These will include additional affidavits, resolutions and an auditor’s certificate confirming that all financials are in order.

The pros and cons of purchasing as an entity

There are a number of benefits that come with purchasing a property in the name of a legal entity rather than as an individual. For example, it provides protection against personal insolvency since a property that is in the name of a legal entity will not be affected or attached should the private individual, such as a trustee or director, become personally insolvent.

In addition, the tax implications can be advantageous. If the legal entity selling is a VAT vendor, transfer duty will not be applicable and VAT may be reclaimed in certain circumstances, and if both the seller and purchaser are registered for VAT, the transaction may be taxed at a zero rate in certain specific circumstances.

However, there are also potential negative impacts relating to tax when it comes to the later sale of the property. In particular, if the property is not a primary residence, the sale will be subject to Capital Gains Tax and the percentage charged is significantly higher than that for an individual. Secondary tax on companies STC and dividend tax may also apply in certain circumstances.

Reselling the property

Because the property is owned by a legal entity, the shareholders, members or trustees will have to act on its behalf in a proposed sale once a vote to proceed with such a sale has been held. A resolution will need to be passed, and an individual given power in order to sign the transfer documents as was done during the purchase process. If the property being sold is the only asset owned by company, there will be certain additional requirements to be met in terms of the Companies Act.

Each situation comes with its own nuances, and as such, working with experienced professionals will ensure that all relevant legislation is complied with and that the transfer process proceeds smoothly.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.