Buying a property in the name of a company or trust – the pros and cons

There is much written about the sale and transfer of property by individuals in their personal capacity. But transactions involving the purchase by a legal entity such as a company, trust, or close corporation are dealt with slightly differently.

The ins and outs of subject to bond approval clauses

While most of the general steps involved in a property transfer remain unchanged, when a legal entity, such as a company or trust, purchases a property, the process differs slightly, particularly regarding the required documentation in order to complete the transfer.

The transfer process

Most significantly, in order for a legal entity to purchase a property, an individual or individuals must be empowered by all its members, directors or trustees, by way of resolution (written “decision”) to sign the offer to purchase on behalf of the company, trust or close corporation. This means that such an individual is given the necessary capacity to represent the legal entity in the transaction by way of resolution. The statutory documents of the legal entity will on its part provide authority for entering into a transaction of such nature.

When it comes to the signing of the transfer documentation, the authorised individual will again sign documents on behalf of the legal entity.

The documentation required is far more extensive when dealing with a property transfer where a legal entity, rather than an individual, is the buyer. These will include additional affidavits, resolutions and an auditor’s certificate confirming that all financials are in order.

The pros and cons of purchasing as an entity

There are a number of benefits that come with purchasing a property in the name of a legal entity rather than as an individual. For example, it provides protection against personal insolvency since a property that is in the name of a legal entity will not be affected or attached should the private individual, such as a trustee or director, become personally insolvent.

In addition, the tax implications can be advantageous. If the legal entity selling is a VAT vendor, transfer duty will not be applicable and VAT may be reclaimed in certain circumstances, and if both the seller and purchaser are registered for VAT, the transaction may be taxed at a zero rate in certain specific circumstances.

However, there are also potential negative impacts relating to tax when it comes to the later sale of the property. In particular, if the property is not a primary residence, the sale will be subject to Capital Gains Tax and the percentage charged is significantly higher than that for an individual. Secondary tax on companies STC and dividend tax may also apply in certain circumstances.

Reselling the property

Because the property is owned by a legal entity, the shareholders, members or trustees will have to act on its behalf in a proposed sale once a vote to proceed with such a sale has been held. A resolution will need to be passed, and an individual given power in order to sign the transfer documents as was done during the purchase process. If the property being sold is the only asset owned by company, there will be certain additional requirements to be met in terms of the Companies Act.

Each situation comes with its own nuances, and as such, working with experienced professionals will ensure that all relevant legislation is complied with and that the transfer process proceeds smoothly.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.

Recommended for you

Amendments to the Financial Intelligence Centre Act (FICA)
Legislative Guidelines

The FIC Act: How it’s tackling money laundering in South Africa[post_view before=""]

The Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC) defines money laundering as “the process used by criminals to hide, conceal or disguise the nature, source, location, disposition or movement of the proceeds of unlawful activities or any interest which anyone has in such proceeds.”

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

Court ruling: The applicability of the Consumer Protection Act in rental agreements[post_view before=""]

In the recently decided case of Magic Vending (Pty) Ltd vs N Tambwe and two other occupants of a rental house in Wynberg, the Western Cape Division of the High Court was asked to rule on a) whether the Consumer Protection Act applied to the case in question and b) whether the enforcement of the forfeiture clause contained in clause 14 of the lease agreement was contrary to public policy.

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

Non-resident sellers: Make sure you comply with SARS requirements[post_view before=""]

Non-resident property sellers should be aware of the requirements of section 35A of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962. The section stipulates that an amount equal to 5% (individuals), 10% (companies) or 15% (trusts) of the proceeds of a sale of immovable property must be withheld and paid over to SARS within 14 days after “the date on which the amount was so withheld” – this is typically the date of registration of transfer. An exception is if the parties agree that the purchase price be paid before registration, in which case the 14 days will be calculated from such payment date.

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

Comment on the Expropriation Bill, 2020[post_view before=""]

This article seeks to highlight some aspects of expropriation of land by looking at the current section 25 of the Constitution and the Expropriation Bill 2020, issued by the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure.

Read More
Property Blog Articles | Advice | Contractual Matters | Market News
Legislative Guidelines

Land claims and their impact on the registration of mortgage bonds[post_view before=""]

When it comes to commercial lending transactions, the lender – usually a commercial or corporate division of a bank – may require confirmation that there are no land claims in process in respect of the property or properties that will form part of the security to be registered in the lending structure.

Read More

Need more Snymans content?

Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Buying a property in the name of a company or trust – the pros and cons

There is much written about the sale and transfer of property by individuals in their personal capacity. But transactions involving the purchase by a legal entity such as a company, trust, or close corporation are dealt with slightly differently.

The ins and outs of subject to bond approval clauses

While most of the general steps involved in a property transfer remain unchanged, when a legal entity, such as a company or trust, purchases a property, the process differs slightly, particularly regarding the required documentation in order to complete the transfer.

The transfer process

Most significantly, in order for a legal entity to purchase a property, an individual or individuals must be empowered by all its members, directors or trustees, by way of resolution (written “decision”) to sign the offer to purchase on behalf of the company, trust or close corporation. This means that such an individual is given the necessary capacity to represent the legal entity in the transaction by way of resolution. The statutory documents of the legal entity will on its part provide authority for entering into a transaction of such nature.

When it comes to the signing of the transfer documentation, the authorised individual will again sign documents on behalf of the legal entity.

The documentation required is far more extensive when dealing with a property transfer where a legal entity, rather than an individual, is the buyer. These will include additional affidavits, resolutions and an auditor’s certificate confirming that all financials are in order.

The pros and cons of purchasing as an entity

There are a number of benefits that come with purchasing a property in the name of a legal entity rather than as an individual. For example, it provides protection against personal insolvency since a property that is in the name of a legal entity will not be affected or attached should the private individual, such as a trustee or director, become personally insolvent.

In addition, the tax implications can be advantageous. If the legal entity selling is a VAT vendor, transfer duty will not be applicable and VAT may be reclaimed in certain circumstances, and if both the seller and purchaser are registered for VAT, the transaction may be taxed at a zero rate in certain specific circumstances.

However, there are also potential negative impacts relating to tax when it comes to the later sale of the property. In particular, if the property is not a primary residence, the sale will be subject to Capital Gains Tax and the percentage charged is significantly higher than that for an individual. Secondary tax on companies STC and dividend tax may also apply in certain circumstances.

Reselling the property

Because the property is owned by a legal entity, the shareholders, members or trustees will have to act on its behalf in a proposed sale once a vote to proceed with such a sale has been held. A resolution will need to be passed, and an individual given power in order to sign the transfer documents as was done during the purchase process. If the property being sold is the only asset owned by company, there will be certain additional requirements to be met in terms of the Companies Act.

Each situation comes with its own nuances, and as such, working with experienced professionals will ensure that all relevant legislation is complied with and that the transfer process proceeds smoothly.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.