Back to Legislative Guidelines
Legislative Guidelines

A closer look at section 29 of the FIC Act

In an earlier article on the Financial Intelligence Centre Act (FICA), we explained that the main objective of the Act is to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities. In this article, we’ll continue the discussion in terms of the duty of accountable institutions to report suspicious transactions to the Finance Intelligence Centre (FIC).

The process to approval for extending a Sectional Title Units

What does the Act stipulate?

Section 29 of the Act outlines that accountable institutions are obligated to report unusual transactions to the FIC. The onus to report these suspicious or unusual activities is placed on any person who carries on, is in charge, manages or is employed by a business. In terms of the Act, the term “business” is interpreted broadly and is deemed to be any person associated with a commercial undertaking as an owner, manager or employee. It’s therefore evident that the obligation to report in terms of section 29 applies to a broad group of people. 

When does this obligation apply?

According to the Act, the obligation applies when “a person becomes aware of something or circumstances arise in which a person can be reasonably expected to be aware or reasonably expected to suspect something”.[1] The “something” relates to where the business has: 

  • received funds stemming from unlawful activities
  • received property that is linked to an offence of terrorist financing
  • been used for money laundering purposes
  • been used to assist an offence being committed that relates to money laundering or terrorist financing.[2]

The onus to report extends beyond a person having actual knowledge of unlawful activity to when a person “[suspects] but cannot prove”.[3] The onus will thus arise when, for example, there are unexplained international transfers received from a client or where deposits are made with the immediate request to transfer the funds elsewhere. FICA has provided a guidance note to accountable institutions to assist them in identifying suspicious or unusual transactions. This note can be found on the FIC website.

The onus arises despite the monetary value of the transaction. It’s also important to note that the relevant party may not be notified that the suspicious or unusual activity has been reported to the FIC. 

[1] Financial Intelligence Centre Guidance Note 4 on Suspicious Transactions Reporting paragraph 2.1 

[2] Financial Intelligence Centre Guidance Note 4 on Suspicious Transactions Reporting paragraph 2.3

[3] Shabaan Bin Hussein and Others v Chnong Fook Kam and Other [1970] AC 942 (PC) ([1969] 3 ALL ER 1627) 948B. 

Want more Snymans articles? Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.

Recommended for you

Properties using borehole water must display a sign
Legislative Guidelines

Environmental Law: Water Rights & Water Pollution in South Africa[post_view before=""]

South Africa is a relatively water-scarce country. The regulation and implementation of water use is therefore very important.

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

Legal rights of homeowners during the repossession process[post_view before=""]

November 2021, January 2022, September 2022, and November 2022 were pivotal months for many homeowners in South Africa who were forced to revaluate their financial positions with the interest rate increases.

Read More
Transfer and Bond Calculators
Legislative Guidelines

The Financial Intelligence Centre Act of 2001 and Cash Threshold Reporting[post_view before=""]

When does the reporting obligation arise for an accountable or reporting institution?

Read More
Minors and immovable property
Legislative Guidelines

The advantages of a life right[post_view before=""]

The Housing Development Schemes for Retired Persons Act 65 of 1988 introduced life rights as a formal form of ownership for retired people in South Africa. This legislation was implemented not only in response to the growth in the retirement village sector but also to provide legal protection to the elderly.

Read More
My name has changed - what happens to my property’s title deed?
Legislative Guidelines

Muslim marriages: A welcome Constitutional Court decision[post_view before=""]

In a long-awaited and groundbreaking decision in the area of family law, the Constitutional Court of South Africa (CC) confirmed the order of constitutional invalidity of the below mentioned Acts, granted by the Supreme Court of Appeal. This decision was confirmed on 28 June 2022.

Read More

Need more Snymans content?

Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Legislative Guidelines

A closer look at section 29 of the FIC Act

In an earlier article on the Financial Intelligence Centre Act (FICA), we explained that the main objective of the Act is to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities. In this article, we’ll continue the discussion in terms of the duty of accountable institutions to report suspicious transactions to the Finance Intelligence Centre (FIC).

The process to approval for extending a Sectional Title Units

What does the Act stipulate?

Section 29 of the Act outlines that accountable institutions are obligated to report unusual transactions to the FIC. The onus to report these suspicious or unusual activities is placed on any person who carries on, is in charge, manages or is employed by a business. In terms of the Act, the term “business” is interpreted broadly and is deemed to be any person associated with a commercial undertaking as an owner, manager or employee. It’s therefore evident that the obligation to report in terms of section 29 applies to a broad group of people. 

When does this obligation apply?

According to the Act, the obligation applies when “a person becomes aware of something or circumstances arise in which a person can be reasonably expected to be aware or reasonably expected to suspect something”.[1] The “something” relates to where the business has: 

  • received funds stemming from unlawful activities
  • received property that is linked to an offence of terrorist financing
  • been used for money laundering purposes
  • been used to assist an offence being committed that relates to money laundering or terrorist financing.[2]

The onus to report extends beyond a person having actual knowledge of unlawful activity to when a person “[suspects] but cannot prove”.[3] The onus will thus arise when, for example, there are unexplained international transfers received from a client or where deposits are made with the immediate request to transfer the funds elsewhere. FICA has provided a guidance note to accountable institutions to assist them in identifying suspicious or unusual transactions. This note can be found on the FIC website.

The onus arises despite the monetary value of the transaction. It’s also important to note that the relevant party may not be notified that the suspicious or unusual activity has been reported to the FIC. 

[1] Financial Intelligence Centre Guidance Note 4 on Suspicious Transactions Reporting paragraph 2.1 

[2] Financial Intelligence Centre Guidance Note 4 on Suspicious Transactions Reporting paragraph 2.3

[3] Shabaan Bin Hussein and Others v Chnong Fook Kam and Other [1970] AC 942 (PC) ([1969] 3 ALL ER 1627) 948B. 

Want more Snymans articles? Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

Follow Snymans on Facebook for more legal information, tips and news about property.